Sunday, January 23, 2011
The Friendly-Shady
Arthur: "Wusup Jud?"
Jud: "Whatupppp? Whatchoo doin tonight?"
Arthur: "Not much; well I've gotta go to this party with a friend of mine."
Jud: "That sounds like fun. Who all is going?"
Arthur: "I'm not real sure. It just one of those thangs; you can probably come, if you want."
Jud: "I dunno; call me when yall are leaving."
Arthur: "Aight man; will do."
Do you recognize this dialogue? You should. It is something, in one form or another, we all do. This is the Friendly-Shady.
In respect to the above example, two things are obvious: 1) Jud didn't have much going on for the night and was down for whatever. 2) Arthur had plans that didn't include Jud and he meant to keep it that way. What wasn't so obvious, but is implied, is the mutual respect each of them had for both themselves and each other. Notice how the dialogue didn't go:
Jud: "Hey, what are you doing tonight?"
Arthur: "Going to a party with another friend."
Jud: "Cool. Can I come?"
Arthur: "No; you won't really know anyone there, I'm a second degree invite, you'd be a third degree invite and I don't want to have to end up babysitting you all night."
Jud: "OK. Thanks for saving me from a night full of awkward non-versations."
The conversation didn't happen like this because that isn't how we communicate; it's much too direct. Instead, we speak more like the first one as Arthur subtly conveys his shadiness in a friendly way. Had Arthur not been friends with Jud, he probably would have just lied to him about what he was doing and said that he'd call him tomorrow. Of course he'd have no intention of calling. It's just one of those things we say.
I, for one, appreciate it when someone friendly-shady's me. It's kind of like when someone cuts you off on the interstate, glances over and smiles and waves. What they're really saying is, "I'm not sorry, but I appreciate your position. No offense, but I've got to get where I'm going and that place doesn't include you."
Communication is so much more than the literal words we speak. Instead, it is an elaborate orchestra of cultural gestures that link us from our individual separation.
Do More Now
...For a further look into the dynamics of "The Degrees of Invitation", visit my new Blog at www.mysecrestvocabulary.wordpress.com.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Recessionomics
Who knows how many good days one has anyway? And,
If he knew that they were so good, then why the hell does he not have them right now and tomorrow and everyday after that? So, then,
Why would one ever even want to know that they are having a good time? And, if so,
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Phantom Pimples

Of course, there are such imperfections in us all that should be cleverly concealed, right? Clinging to an undeniable intent on anonymity, pimples are ugly and it is deeply ingrained within us, in our survival-of-the-fittest sexual pursuits, to strive to be as beautiful as humanly possible.
However, in our pursuit of physical maintenance and/or improvement do we, at some point of diminishing returns, begin to lose what it is to even look human. Instead, we begin to collectively move toward an articulation of the pop-culture inspired image of of a pseudo-human. (Isn't the definition of Superficiality - to regard only the surface of things.) But the surface of what things, and how is what is attractive influenced? For there is no supreme court Justice of Beauty whom sits atop a tall podium with an iron-clad gavel in hand, passing judgement on all who dare to face the crowd of day.
Instead, it is a subjective rule that's beset in each man and woman yet it is similarly drawn within each of us according to popular culture and the sub-culture within the geography that one lives and the social circle or crew in which one runs.
The pop culture component, obviously, is that which is promoted on MTV or by famous athletes and celebrity movie stars and musicians. The effect of chicken head revolutionaries like Pamela Anderson and The Beatles and the Governah, Arnold Schwarzenegger, impact the way each of us view style and beauty and philosophy and economics and the political issues of the time and what it means to be Cool J like L.L or wear Trucker's hats like Ashton Kutcher. These mainstream artists and even those of them who are merely the faces of art like Miley and Brittney, through the power of mass communication, have cleverly molded the icon of the Cool and, too, of the Beautiful.
And by way of TMZ Television and bloggers like you and smart phones the MJ's (pick one) of the day implant themselves all across America and most of the world into your high schools and colleges and rough street porches and in the Cheers of your choosing where these superficial ideals are perceived and consumed by the masses and purchased by those whom are able and willing to go that extra mile for the sake of the preservation of his or her vanity. In these few brave, cool people is the gavel of the sub-culture borne. For they wear their fake-bake muscles and plastic breasts and Coach purses amidst a confident swagger that draws the rest in like the sun does it's planets and the style portrayed therein bounces like balls contagiously against one another from the earliest adaptors to the mids to the so-two-years-ago-jeans lates and this trickle down continues and the earlies are always buying and trying and the mids keep their calculators on them at all times and the latest of the late adaptors may very well be the least superficial of all, but they surely spend most of their life whining of the ways of the present and nervous in the place of uncomfort that is anywhere outside their safe little existence.
So is it wrong to be that way - to sport an imperfection rather than so blatantly hide it with the efforts associated with fashion. Is it right to be a pho-hawk metro dude who looks like a lady? Or is the right really somewhere in between? If it is right to exist in the Mid, then us waiters-on-acceptance must thank the Pamela's and tanning salon patrons and also those crotchety old stubborn mountain men because without them, either side, then how would one ever know what Beauty is?
Indeed, popcorn pimple poppers have been around since the time of the leaves of Adam and Eve. They exist in every continent and in every culture. For change is a way of beauty and beauty is a human quality and wherever there are humans there will be those who aim to perfect upon our appearance and also our condition and also those, from the perspective of the middle-dwelling masses, who take the aim for perfection just a little too far too fast. The doing so of perpetually changing in an effort to achieve that envied form, sadly, almost always is produced in selfish aims, but the succeeding, gladly, is an infectious being.
"The animal does not lie beneath the thin layer of our skin, but beneath the thin layer of our clothes." Yahia Lababidi
Get in where you fit in, but remember not to fail to Bee Yourself.
Do More Now
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Pocketfull of Eyeballs
Hmmmm. Breathing in deep with blue-skied filled eyes; these Sunday afternoon porch beers; the late-night sloments; the split seconds of want; the next to last seconds of shaken open romance; the passion-filled chance that something will go as it should; and it does because of a pocketfull of eyeballs of days-past that warrants the capacity for greatness.
Thank you for your wise words; for the trial times and the cold nights; for the irony; for the laughter in the wake of awake mornings; for being there; for not; for...
Give me your eyeballs - LIFE.
Give them to me!
And I will graft them from your every-day-like pieces and take them as my own. I'll take them from your Can I Get bums, your Here You Go professors, your Pastors, your Priests, your airport-bar wisdom-nugget purveyors, your strangers in line or at a wait-bench outside of a noontime breakfast nook and I thank you for the half-smile hey-nods, the good morning, good evening, and good night; for the five broken noses, the car wreck, the wedding handshakes, the funeral hugs, and for the failure and success that shall surely follow.
I love them.
I need them.
And I will take them from YOU every day. I'll pack'em in my jeans pockets till their full as I carve them from your faces. I'll take them from you as if they were already mine. I'll cut them from you as if your head were the pumpkin of my Jackolantern - sharp-gripped with a short white knife; hand in the skull, fingers swimming in your flat, white-seed-guts; in strait lines and on sharp edges; cutting slowly and gripping tightly, deep-questionly slicing, prodding, and feeling the tip of the end of the dull blade with the tip of the index finger of my other hand as the knife delicately cuts.
Give me your soul.
Every one of you.
Give me the negative of yours and it will be the candle-lit light of mine.
These are my pocketfull of eyeballs.
Thank you for them...
Appreciate More Now
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
The Handwashing Dilemma

I, for one, noticed this little terrerium of a greater dilemma of "What is Truth?" about nine months ago when I was still managing / selling construction projects. Meeting the guy for the second time at a Longhorn off Southside, I arrived first, went to the restroom, went through the 'wash or no wash dilemma', washed, dried with the blow dryer and left the restroom for the restuaraunt to see the potential client, hands folded at the fingers and smiling in a fake way, standing patiently at the hostess stand. As we shook, I noticed the most quaintly peculiar look as his brow lowered wrinkledly and his eyes darted quickly to the hostess who then led us to our table.
Thinking that maybe it was just my imagination but still debating the root of the awkwardness, I began to expirement with people: washing and not washing when leaving the restroom in certain situations; shaking and not shaking; replying "I'm Good" in lieu of "I am Well" and vice versa dependant upon the person; wearing matching clothes some days and not matching on others (yeah right, that's never on purpose). And I tried on these social miscues for people so as to document thier reactions. Since doing so rather consistently for the last three or four months, I've noticed three apparent truths about manners: 1) What is proper varies from person to person and from sub-culture to sub-culture, 2) What is proper to a given individual is instant as it is transferred via the subconscience, and 3) What is proper, even if only for the moment, is definant.
But seriously, why do we even shake hands? According to my good friend Google, 'the act of shaking hands upon meeting has been around since about 200 B.C. as a gesture of peace showing that the hands hold no weapons. Shaking hands, weather upon meeting, greeting, departing, for congatulations, at the end of a competition, or to seal an agreement, has since been used, in some form or another, has served humanity with a similar purpose: to convey trust, balance, and equality.'
Moreover, let's look at the evolution of the handshake and it's multiple and perpetually forming styles. From the classic, firm and outstreched with three to four up and down motion three to four inch jostles and release, to the "it's been awhile since the last wedding or funeral" handshake and big pat on the back complete with safe wheather-talk questions and followed by an awkward silence, to the slap me some skin friend, up high, down low, with the elbow; to the handpound, once with the fist, 'now blow it up' and bring it back; to the inverted shake with a bring it in for the real thing chest pound quasi-hug that you might give to a 'long time no see' friend in a public place.
The next step, prior to even speaking, is your style of dress. As one who typically wears clothes from the last-season sales rack, it still amazes me as to the massive variety of the "right things to wear" available. And as a man that lives a Tale of Two Cities traveling back and forth to and from Brunswick and Jacksonville, I have an interesting vantage point of noticing even the slightest differences in style from one state to another. In Georgia, the Polo horse still stands strong; in Florida, the dragon T. In Georgia, no gel; in Florida, gel (white guys). In Florida, girls still wear skimpy little hot ass little cutoff jean shorts. In Georgia, most women buried thiers just after "Way Down Yonder on the Chatahoochie" stopped playing on country music radio stations. And the back and forth differences continue to colors and shoes and jackets and you get the picture; but wait, theres more.
When I first moved to Jax, I moved to Southside and then to Neptune Beach shortly thereafter, which is where I stayed for about two years up until the beginning of July '09. Now I'm back on Southside. Having had the opportunity to see the beaches with each set of sub-cultural eyes, I remember the Handwashing Dilemma-esque situation that we, my friends and I, encountered weekendly. (First, a little geography: in order to get to "the beaches" from the mainland one had to cross the intercoastal waterway, or "the ditch.") Those who lived in town on the other side of the ditch whom often commuted to the beach bars on weekend nights to party were considered "townies" and those of us who lived at the beach were refferred by them as "beachrats." For the most part, it was a harmless rivalry and longnecks and threehorns did play with one another often. Looking back, the amazing thing was our ability to spot a Townie from across the bar or even from across the parking lot. Even more incredible is that, despite the occasional chachie-douchebag dudes, everyone from Jax that goes out at the beach dresses pretty similar. Now this is profound in two distinctly different ways: 1) Being that the beach bars are by far the best bars, people come from all over Jacksonville and the surrounding area to get drunk at them. While the sub-culture and the style of dress in whatever nook-and-cranie part of town in which they live may vary, those that come to the Beach even every now and then to hang tend to have adapted their nightly wardrobe to that which matches the majority at the beaches or at the bar or bars where he or she most frequently hangs. 2) We almost always picked out the Townies from the Beachrats from a distance despite the fact that their dress was similar. This means, to me, that we were picking up on sub-conscience clues to peg them as friend or foe, native or outsider, skeasy beach biotch or easy townie doe. From the blatenly obvious, yet sometimes misleading cues - beachrats drive beachcruisers, while townies park their cars and walk - to the more vague and often more effective subtelties - the comfort-in-my-kingdom squint of the eyes versus the bobble-head-swivel-desperate-search-for-a-place-to-talk-smiledly-nervousness that screams OUT OF PLACE to everyone in the place. I now know all too well because I've slowly but surely become the later - an other-side-of-the-ditch son of the rich in a poor place wearing two and half year old pair of shoes that vaguely match my Polo Jeans and Brooks Bros. collared shirt with the golden lamb laced and hanging from above by a golden rope in his gut, which isn't ironic at all because that is who I am when I am the townie at the beach bars, walking from an eleven mile driven town truck to a place that was once in my element, but is now only an occasional scene where I must wear an out of date chamelion mask and only hope that I can find multiple high fives and, if I'm lucky, one stimulatingly funny conversation amongst the millions of beach cruisers that comfortably laugh and sit and dude-bro-whatup girl-holla-holla-holla at each other in their dreadfully cool dragon T's and board shirts and skater shoes and swagger jacker skater haters and popped collars and gel and hourglass shaped dresses that top out fakely with bleach-blonde hair and blue-contacts blue eyes.
But back to the initial meeting of a friend or not-yet-friend; after a dry and dirty or clean and clammy handshake that may or may not have been the appropriate shaken style, after the all-know half-second glace exchange of the respective digs, there is the initial "hi, how have you been, it's good to see you." Now, the grammatically correct answer to the respective grammatically correct question is, "I'm well, how are you?" From there, it is whitely proper to engage in a sequetially unraveling line of weather-talk questions and short, politely smiling answers in which the allowable topics are the weather, traffic, the resturaunt or establishment or even about the general area of the city if it is one that is foriegn to either one of them (all of which should be obviously agreeable). It's deemed proper, mind you, grammatically - i.e. by a certain group of people who study english and continue to box it in and name it according to what they think is proper.
Back in the days when I used to manage construction projects and back in the days prior when I used to hold concrete pump's hoses, manage sump pump motors, and literally dig ditches to place aggregate (rocks) on hot-Georgia-sun days, the way to aproach someone verbally in the cool 6:30 morning dew covered site was simple - "Mornin" , "Mornin." From there, silence ensued for a second or ten, followed by a strait-faced hilarious story and laughs and banter and there was always a poke-fun at the new guy and one behind-the-back-talk for the foreman until he shows and then the day begins and the stories continue, some true - SOME - but all were as funny as a sheep dog on ice skates.
And on the ball court, there's whole different verbal routine and a brand new cadence. As there is I'm sure in a Ball Room with courtsies and "Good Evening, Madame"'s, as there is a slightly different etiquete entrance speach with each of your circles; at work, home, church, with Mom, with Dad, with the girl you hope to soon "know", with the ex-girl you once knew, with the waitress at Longhorn versus the cashier at Wendy's.
The gist is that many of us live our whole life in accordance to this seemingly endless barrage of Sienfield-esque rules of engagement. We speak, dress, shake, and fake our way through each day as if drone lemmings marching to and from our involuntary appointments speaking, dressing, and shaking involuntarily to a similarly, yet inconsistantly percieved Jody Call, as if to the tune of a military-esqu song so appropriately named, "Manners", by The Unending Attempt to Fit In.
And more appealing, when you back up from yourself and look at the whole wonderful ordeal as if a bird on an away-from-it-all perch, the author of the song, The Unending Attempt to Fit In, is as blind and brillient as the would-be son of Ray Charles and Helen Keller. While this Unending Attempt is at the very core of all that is human, he doesn't even realize what he or she means to fit into. If it is a box, then it is an elastic box; always changing; forever expanding in one circle and minimizing in another; perpetually chamelion in color from the outside and also in the in. The threshold between right and wrong, good and evil, coothe and uncoothe, it seems, varies dependent upon the social circle as the wheather varies according to the presence of the sun. And we get so caught up in this neverending tussle of an attempt at vain, fake, correctness until it happens. Until finally, on some rain-skyed day on the northside, God grants us eyes and wings and cold, hungry, poverty and we can see, for but only a moment, the greater truth of the lacking, which is also the giving. Lying flat on the back, eyes to the place in the clouds where the sun should be, peered on only by the bird that may or may not sing, can one realize that the sun, the true sun, weather it's raining or cold or sweat-drippingly scorching, is there; weather we like it or not, it's there; in all of it's terrible glory, it's there; it's always there.
And how much more often does this dilemma play out in our lives - to act according to the avoidance of immediate WTF-looks and perhaps, still, to satisfy a most acceptable conclusion as we forgoe the action that would otherwise serve the best interest of the greater good? In the friendly-shady invite or the shady-friendly deni'nvite, in big ole fake boobs, in the waive and smile because I just cut you off in traffic, its in holding the door for strangers who are within ten or less steps, and in saying Ma'am or Sir, or in the way one crosses her legs in certain company. All of these and more are indicative of man's means to cope with man. How do you cope everyday? Are we so wrong for doing so?
To do what is best for all is best of all, always?,
Just because it makes people laugh doesn't always mean it's a Good joke,
None of us always wash our hands,
Truth More Now
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
The Sadiction
And the rage ends and the sadicted salesman is full and warm and satisfied for a little while until the return of the envied NO's as they keep coming as long as he keeps going and they taunt him, building want for the stimulus created upon the execution of his will upon another, upon the world, and upon himself. Some may define this actualized notion of Allbeing as Power and still others prefer to call it Influence. Either way one may spin it, once you've had it more than once, you need it like a baby calf needs his mother's milk in the morning or as a lonely woman needs a hug and a blanket and a soft kiss on the forehead in the evening or like a twelve-year-old class clown needs a grand applause of laughter in the middle of every day that he is alive.
Don't be afraid to be the class clown,
Don't fear the word NO,
Composure is Power,
Do More Now,
The Young, Poor, and Happy Sadict
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Ego Breakfast

In Bill’s defense, however, the job is legit. The company sells chemical cleaning solutions to industrial facilities at a great profit in a great niched system. The benefits of the job include salary, truck payment, and an opportunity to make a very significant commission. The problem, for me, is the product – SOAP. Do I really want to be a soap salesman? (Me, a strong, smart, passionate man with the potential to change the world; me, as humble as I am cocky; me, a once to-be-when-I-grow-up professional baseball player / astronaut?) Do I have it in me to lay down my pride so as to again pick up a paycheck?
I think that this is a dilemma that I have in common with about sixty-one million and seven (61,000,007) Americans – Swallow my ego, my pride, my passion, my freedom for the sake of survival. How many of us eat a daily Ego Breakfast for the sake of keeping our home and making a truck payment? Many, eat this breakfast selflessly and so honorably as they do it for the sake of their kids or their parents or their significant loved one. Many more, still, swallow their once-passionate pursuits of doing for the sake of an extra 1,000 square feet and a boat payment as they keep up with the Amercianized greed-gravied Jefferson’s. What is the value of your ego?
How many people sleep on sidewalks under the Life section of Sunday’s newspaper, wearing brown-streaked Hanes and an old, brown Falcons toboggan with their ego well in tact? Probably not that many. And there is the bitch of the dilemma – where is the threshold to the point where there is no turning back? At a certain point, the preservation of things like passion and freedom that exist inside one’s figurative ego can crush a man under the weight of the real money-needing world. Conversely, similar to the saddened boredom inherent in Bill yesterday while on the road in the blue Honda, too many people live out their life one Ego Breakfast at a time in a constant state of denial and in the ignorance of their one-day regret.
I read a good short story the other day that does a great job to annunciate the Dilemma that I describe. Many mid-twenty unemployed and newly employed world citizens are faced with this dilemma. The story, How Much Land Does a Man Need by Leo Tolstoy, describes man’s incessant need for more in lieu of what is his inherent place. While I by no means promote life-complacency, there is a Josh-Implied lesson within the story that should not be missed or misinterpreted.
“Each man has a unique set of skills that is his talent. His talent is created by and improved upon according to his interests. His interests are given from God in his nature. He is Free only in the doing of his true interest.”
If you have to eat your Ego for breakfast, do it for but a short while and drown it with extra syrup,
Pursue your personal passionate freedom with your pride intact,
Do More Now
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Sheet Karate

Friday, June 26, 2009
Gimpy-Gazelles
I sighed and thought, “that’s what I freakin get.”
Don’t be that Gimpy-Gazelle, always lagging behind at the water’s edge during the dry season. Believe me; ‘That Lion ‘el BITE-CH-YOU!’
Lions. Though I’ve never been to Africa, I’ve always been fascinated by lions from what I know of them from the Discovery Channel. How they fight. How they play and travel in Prides. It’s fascinating how they scheme at night. Observing, I notice that the only animals that ever feels the lion’s bite and ultimately fills their belly is the weakest of the weak of the more peaceful jungle animals such as zebras, antelopes, or gazelle’s. Beyond that, it seems that the Pride doesn’t even target the fast ones or the strong ones or the ones that stick with the group. Upon further research, however, I found that Lions aren’t in fact prejudiced toward gimpy, slow-running meat. In fact “Lions are opportunist hunters, and, after a careful stalk, will take the closest animal regardless of its age, sex or condition…” (link)
And what of the Gazelles – the Grasseaters. They roam across the countryside. Quietly; always together; their food ever-present; it seems as if they never need to squabble or kill or fight. It seems like they are at peace.
Grasseaters are the animals (or humans) who are content to live off of the bland, do-able facets of the world which are in abundance – on which one can survive all the way to death. They are peaceful beings, content to live on the Tofu Taco’s and veggie-burgers. “Wildebeasts are gregarious animals, and scattered individuals will often attach themselves to a herd of some other species…We have noted no aggressive behavior or display of any sort between wildebeests and other herbivores.” (From the book, The Wildebeast in Western Masailand, by Talbot and Talbot)
The way of the Grasseater is as if a good dream that can only be in that uber-world that I suppose most Liberal pixies exist. Socialism, as far as I can tell, is just that – a pareto-peaceful-Neverland that would be palatable if only all men were content with the lesser-life – the saltless, the ham-less, the WNBA existence of basketball without slamdunks, crossover-360-no-look-allyoops, and last second Jordan-esque heroics. But what the leftists – the Grasseaters – don’t realize is that the peaceful gazelle’s of the world need their gimpy counterparts to occasionally get picked off and devoured by the hungry lions that constantly ambush the herd. They need them because they would otherwise slow them down. They would otherwise disrupt their peace.
As I was walking home from the library that day I thought, “It was probably some bum (who stole my bike). I shoulda known. They’re always hanging around there. Afterall, it’s a free place to hang around if you’ve got nothing else to do.” (If you have no job or no money to blow someplace else – afterall, I was there too) I guess I trusted in the inherent goodness of people. Still, I shook my head and laughed softly as I thought of a quote I’ve kept from an old GSU professor – “If we make doormats of ourselves, should we be surprised when people wipe their feet all over us?”
So then, what is the answer? Darwinism? Ah, yes, the survival of the fittest. The old, the sick, the retarded and eternally injured ones of us – are better off dead. If they can’t keep up; if they aren’t savy enough investors; if they don’t have the UNMPH it takes to make it big or even scratch by in this world, then the world, then our whole human race is for the better if they are gobbled up and forgotten. That is the way, right?
No, that couldn’t be. We are not animals. We are understandingful, compassionate beings. That is what separates us from animals – compassion that is. So then the choosing few that can and do work our little knuckles to the bone will continue to do so. Through storming recessions and even in bull-headed-blue-sky wealth, tighten our grip upon the rope and bear the load of the poor and lazy and eternally sick and injured and retarded masses. We will sacrifice our hardworked-for freetime at soup kitchens and give to charity. We will always give-the-penny, never expecting to take.
Isn’t there a happy medium? Isn’t there a way to get mine but still give back. Socialism definitely isn’t the answer. Look at Russia. That didn’t work. Look at Kali-forn-yia (sorry Arnold). Back to Russia; it didn’t work because there are Lions amongst the peaceful herd and these individuals have a blood-thirst for the finer things of life - for power, for more than the bland diet necessary for mere survival. This is the system of difference that was created. There is an idea behind capitalism and that is that every man holds a self-evident truth – the pursuit of self interest. That is, each man, at his core, will act in the best interest of himself and the culmination of the actions of all men (whether in cooperation or in opposition) will be the result of the civilized economy of the whole. There is one statement-question that, to me, summarizes the dilemma presented here:
“To do what is best for all, is best of all, always?
But what do we do with the Gimpy-Gazelles?
I am in the process of starting a study of just that. The name of the study, the name of the to-be organization, the name of the fixinta-website is 1000 Phalanges. The idea is to develop an effective method to analyze the hopeless, the homeless, and the jobless person and then help him pull himself up so that he can rejoin the rest of us working, playing, contributing many - grasseaters and lions alike. This is not to be a soup-kitchen charity. It is to be a concentrated effort to pick up one worthy man or woman at a time. I will not knock off early nor quit my job (once I get a new one) to extend to this person. I will, however, sacrifice some of my extra time. A friend once told me in an email, “you’ve got to take care of yourself first, so that you will be able to take care of others.”
That Lion ‘el BITE-CH-YOU!
Bad luck is for losers,
Be the Lion or learn to run with the herd,
Don’t be a Gimpy-Gazelle,
Do More Now
Monday, June 15, 2009
Change Your Balls
Last month, I went to Memphis, Tn for their annual'Memphis in May Barbecue Fest.' If you've never been to Barbecue Fest, you should. Picture 300 Keg Parties - all complete with fine music, even finer woman, and some of the best Barbecue you've ever put in your mouth.Though I didn't realize it then, the statement "Change Your Balls" can be very deep, a bit discomforting (ha), and, perhaps even, inspiring.
About five years ago I created a "secret" word with myself - Fearless Facade. (The word, still in my vocabulary, is on my Fixinta list so it may show up on here at some point.) A man's Fearless Facade is the outer layer that he (or she) wears when he is uncomfortable or anxious or scared. Under this cloak he can mingle with Cake-Eaters at coaster-parties and can comfortable take prospective clients out to lunch. I feel that, to some extent, we all have a fearless facade that we occasionally slip on. We incognitoedly wear it like the magic sunglasses that Julian wears in the movie "Big Daddy." My fearless facade is a lightly smug, partially cocky, sarcastically laugh-at-himself-funny persona. Thinking back, there were phases in my life (like High School) where I rarely took the mask off. Thinking forward, there has got to be a better way.
On Monday, June 8, 2009, at about 8:21 A.M., I was fired (technically put, "laid off") from my JOB as a Project Manager for an industrial construction company. I have a mind to present a pretty good see-what-had-happened-was story about the events that lead to my Walking Papers acceptance, but I won't do it. It doesn't matter. I was boredly employed in a mediocre job; now I am not.
Being that I got the heads-up that what went down was going to be going down two weeks ago today, the contents of the 8:21 conversation with our President came to me lacking surprise. I was ready with a good "C-mon man" response, but he didn't ask me for one. Since the day (two weeks ago today) that I found out about my to-be-firing, I've been flipping through the closet of my personality for that all-too-familiar, fearless, incognito robe. The only problem was, the skin that I searched for didn't seem to fit as well as it had in high school.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Fixintas
There is a disease that afflicts millions of men and woman each year. It is, in the long run, far worse than the swine flu; worse than cancer; worse than AIDS. The Fixintas is an procrastination-affliction that begins with the Put-it-off-till-tomorrow’s, progresses to a sour, helplessness existence called the Doldrums, and, if left untreated for the youthful part of one’s life, can lead to a dreadful result of the Shoulda-Woulda-Coulda’s.
It starts, in most instances, by a casual 4:30-laziness. An attitude that wafts the wants of ‘today’ toward tomorrow. Often, the above-mentioned wants are the seemingly trivial, day-to-day events such as a call-back to an old friend. At work, I commonly put off the need-to-be-approved-invoices and the need-to-be-called potential clients. Instead, I cruise Facebook till the end of the day. Annually, it is just as easy to put off a
The problem is that these seemingly insignificant tasks that we “put off until tomorrow” stack up on each tomorrow until they are lost in a waste basket of last month’s lists. Some, and oftentimes many, of these to-do’s are foregone the second they are put off.
Deep down, whether or not we admit it at the moment, they are missed and it is the missing that leads to the second phase of the Fixintas: the Doldrums. In my mind, this is a green, slimy place. In my mind, it is the place from the kid’s movie – The Phantom Tollbooth.
In the movie, the main character,
Though the excerpt-poem per the Lethargian in the movie is well put, in a figurative and holistic sense, don’t take it too literally. The Doldrums can exist within a weed-ridden couch or inside the unchallenging white walls of a square office. The Doldrums are at the table at an early-to-late-morning-gas-station-coffee-stop; they exist on the other side of a Soap Opera with-in the restless suburban housewife; and they hang out on ghetto street corners. I can think of two people close to me who I believe presently exist in the that drull, circular place.
One works in the office next to me, the other, is one of my best friends. Each man has a job, goes, does his duty, and returns home. One, I believe, sulks all day and night every day and night in his misery. The other escapes by chemical means. The whole world is against each of them. Nothing, it seems is thier fault and I can relate to each of them, because I have been there.
It is kind-of like the central theme from another great movie –Groundhog Day, with Bill Murray. In case you live in a cave and you haven’t seen it, the gist of the movie is this: Bill Murray’s character, Phil Conner, continues to wake up on the same day, Groundhog Day, in the same small town of
Phil proceeds to give up on any hope for a future ‘meaningful’ life as he goes on a hilariously suicidal, armored-truck-robbing, town-hottie-seducing rampage. In the end, however….well, let’s get back to the point.
The third and final phase of the Fixintas is the Shoulda-Woulda-Coulda’s. My father and his brother (my uncle), reportedly used to call my Grandmother Shoulda-woulda-coulda. While they called her this in jest, I’m treating the term as the advanced and irreversible stages of a tragic ailment - the Fixintas. Once a person has contented through his healthy years, unproductive and easy-going amidst the Doldrums, he gets to a point of ‘awakened regret.’ The Shoulda-Woulda-Coulda-infected man looks back on his life as if he were J. Alfred Proofrock– the old, perpetually-indecisive man of the similarly named T.S. Elliot poem – as he wonders what life would-of been like if only could-of dared to try. Notice the many-a-old-men who are languidly crippled in there scowling, jealous-of-youth yearning for a relief-ful death from their constant, what-if-headache that continues to drain their capacity for any appreciation of the otherwise inherent beauty of day-to-day-life. As they usually wish their fate on all men, these grumpy old men are the Letharigians that coax and grumble new potential subjects into the Doldrums.
So, how can we avoid this seemingly inevitable, potentially horrible existence.
First, I look to the opposite of the above – kids. Why are they seemingly Fixinta-immune? Are they issued a behind-the-back vaccine just after birth. Notice that you never hear a kid say, “Let’s play ‘King of the Hill’ on Thursday.” No; they see, they want, they do. Children don’t plan; they never put off; they don’t have it in them to develop a case of the Fixintas. They are immune because they are daring. They are daring because they are unscathed. They are scathed because they are irresponsible.
That’s the answer, then. The anecdote is to forgo planning, right? Wrong. The answer is to forgo responsibility, right? Wrong. We, as adults, must be responsible. Responsability is, to me the precursor nesessary in order to define one as Adult. But adulthood is no excuse for the Fixintas.
Next, I'll borrow a soundbite from the number one golfer in the world. While he did end up choking yesterday at the TPC, Tiger Woods recently let loose a quote from an interview with Scott Van Pelt. It is possibly the most empowering statement from a man who otherwise should be perfectly content. You can find a more complete summary of the interview here, but the quote, in raw form, follows:
SVP: So there’s no point when you can sort of put the feet up on a Tuesday afternoon and say ‘Today I’m not going to the gym’.?
Tiger: “No. Because the next…that’s…I look at life as: the greatest thing about tomorrow is that I will be better than I am today. And that’s the way I’ve always lived my life. So I have no understanding why people do hit the snooze button because you have a chance to become a better person, become - for me - a better athlete…all the different things you can do to become better for tomorrow. Why wouldn’t you take advantage of that?”
With that attitude, it isn’t hard to see why the man is a living legend in his respective sport. But, let’s be real; it would be a whole lot easier to get up early every day to train to play golf. To train to do what it is that we REALLY want to do. Is that the answer? - Probably. Do I know all the answers? - Probably not. Am I presently (as I type) trying to figure out MY Fixinta-Remedy? – Yes.
To summarize, here is my current, always-evolving, step-by-step solution to Paralysis-due-to-Procrastination:
1. Determine what it is you want to do. What are you passionate about? Don’t look too hard. You know. Deep down, you know. Just acknowledge what you like, follow that curiosity, and accept that this is your passion.
2. Make lists. Daily; monthly; and yearly.
3. Borrowing a term from Stephen Covey, “Choose big rocks” to put on your lists i.e. Limit your commitments to those things that you can readily handle. Plan to achieve those commitments. Do.
4. Regulate on your waste-time. Don’t eliminate it, but regulate it. We all need our Beer-Couch-FamilyGuy-time, but be mindful not to melt into the lazy-boy. Relax for a while after work, then get up and get going.
5. Make a side list of things that you want to one-day do but don’t have the time to get to right now. I’ve named mine the “Fixintas.” Re-read those things each time you add to or check off your Fixinta items. Make time to Cut and Paste from this list to you current to-do list. Do.
6. Find the courage to dare to do. (Not just any kind of courage, on the kind of courage in the following poem: The Hill, By Nissim Ezekiel)
7. Develop the discipline to keep doing. Here is the step that I still struggle with. Maybe I'll revisit this post one day when I figure this one out.
I write this long post on the folly of the Fixintas because I have a bad case of them and I constantly struggle to overcome them. Until recently, my pride-fear paired with my fauma have me looking back on a life full of shoulda’s, woulda’s, and coulda’s. Lucky for me, I still have my youth. I can still change my non-ways and one-day contribute as I continue to appreciate. For me, this is just the first step. Stay tuned for the next; I’ll need you there as I need you here.
And You…out there; if your still with me; if you feel me; how do you avoid the in-the-rut-“Groundhog-Day” existence of your life? What is your passion? How do you make a difference?
Do More Now,
- Not Just Another Dog Named Tag
Friday, May 1, 2009
The Should-Be
Often I hear people say things like: “They shouldn't be treating people that way”; "Guys should know to put the toilet seat down after you’re finished peeing”; “Popey’s should’ve had plenty of chicken stocked up” (funny youtube video); “That’s just not the way things are supposed to be.”
Well how should they be? And, more importantly, according to whom? The should-be is a widely used, specifically subjective term. The way things ‘should be’ to me - a southern, middle-class, mildly conservative male who likes Pork Chops and Succotash with his stove-top, hot sauce and beer - would be drastically different than a Petit English woman named Ms. Gertrude Prudey, whom prefers non-fat Jam on her crumpet, which she enjoys daily with a small glass of pinky-finger-raised hot tea. How different is the should-be for a 17 year old Somali pirate on the verge of starvation and beyond the outer limits of hope. How should things be if you were the mother of an Arab terrorist that is under a waterboard, on a table, in the middle of a windowless torture-for-vital-info room? But we will get to that shortly; for now, on the lighter side, let’s consider the Toilet Seat example.
I have never been able to understand, for the life of me, why woman make such a big deal about us putting the toilet seat down once we are finished with our “number one” sequence. It is as if all women, once they reach the threshold of the bathroom instantly become completely blind as they apparently do not have the where-with-all to see that the seat is up before they sit down. Or, maybe, yall (women) approach the toilet as if you were a defensive back, backpedaling, eyes strait ahead until your butt just happens to reach the toilet. And once you sit down, unbeknownst of the present position of the toilet seat, you have a 50-50 chance of falling in. Do woman actually do this? Do you girls actually sit down into a bowl full of toilet water? It’s hard for me to believe. Maybe. But, I don't think so.
I think that the reason why you make such a big deal about it is because of a social disconnect that exists between men and woman. You (woman) take our (men) leaving the toilet seat up as an inconsiderate and dis-respectful thing to do. While some of the threshold-blinded-defensive-back women may actually end up with wet-ass-syndrome, most of the commotion as it relates to upright toilet seats can be attributed to a misunderstanding of cross cultural perspectives. (….whoa, too much caffeine, I know, I know, I'll slow down.) It is this social disconnect that I am concerned with as it relates to the should-be. In college, while at
Back to the Toilet Seat Example, the social or cultural disconnect between what should be from the perspective of the Man and the Woman is rooted in incentives that have been reinforced or challenged via experience throughout the course of the given person's life. Me as a man, thinking logically and in my own best interest, think to myself upon shaking it, zipping it, and buttoning it: “it sure is a good thing that I put the toilet seat up because otherwise I would have gotten a little bit of over spray on it (the seat) and no-one wants to sit in that. Not because I am too lazy to put it back down, so I’ll just leave it up so that it can dry before the next person comes in here.” As I walk out I pass a beautiful nice-butted brown-haired woman. She, being a sort of female anomaly that is neither blinded at the threshold nor feels the need to back peddle toward the toilet, sees the upward oriented seat and thinks to herself: “Even though that guy was ruggedly good looking, he has terrible manners. Why wouldn’t he just put the seat back down when he is finished? How freaking hard is that?”
Each player in this example has a completely different idea of what should-be; of what is GOOD. Notice that we have created our conception of the right way things should be done according to incentives that meet our best interest. Being that either up or down toilet seats for men and women respectively suit his or her best interest, consider the idea that such a conception is constantly reinforced (on average, about 4 - 5 times per day).
Another example, would you steel if it were the only way you could eat? Would you steel if it were the only way your family could eat? Somalia, as are many communities all over the world, live in a hopeless poverty that I cannot even fathom. In a society where genocide is commonplace, where can a young man be expected to find his place; where can he find a common ground with life; can he see a light at the end of his dreary, dark tunnel? The answer for many men and women all over the world is that they there is no way to make an honest life via hard work and education. So they steel. At first, at six, a loaf of bread. Later, at twelve years old, a pick-pocketed wallet. As a man, at seventeen, much larger opportunities arise. All his life, the only way he has known is to steal. This is his should-be. To him, a man who isn’t expected to live past nineteen, hijacking cargo ships is a once-in-a-life-time 'Who Wants to Be a Millionaire' opportunity to live; really live. It doesn’t matter to him that US Marines can blow his head clean off from 450 yards away. Economically speaking, he is risking a two year loss versus a fifty plus year gain. To him, pirating is the only way. To him, this is a GOOD should-be..
Now, a personal question: how is your should-be? How is your should-be when it comes to using torture techniques such as waterboarding in order to obtain vital information? Think about the person you love the most. Picture their smiling face. Think back on the last time you saw them. Now, imagine that he or she has been kidnapped and is being held in a very unpleasant place (...like the girl in the badass movie - "Taken" ). You know that if you don't find him or her soon, they will be killed or worse. Finally, imagine that a man sits in front of you who knows exactly where to find your missing loved one. What should-be done to find out what you need to know?
Do More Now
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Chickenheadish

Chickenhead (noun) - A girl who talks without ever saying anything. She fashions every part of her life in accordance with her mass-media influenced self-created mold of what is expected of a girl (or woman) of her age, in her geographical location, and within her socio-economic means. She is the plastic persona of the should-be.
Dressed in her fake face, sitting at the bar sipping something that looks far too delicious for me to drink in public, she looks good. Damn good, in fact. I approach her with a fifty-percent-of-the-time clever line. She bites. I play along.
I call. We either meet up or I pick her up. Either at dinner or in the car or on the phone, the weather-talk eventually runs out. The game, the banter between us, gets old. Where do the good times go from that awkward silence but horizontal? Nowhere but there.
Her, in her thong high heels, nice butt, and perfectly still boobs. Me, the hypocrite that loves to hate her for her chickenheadedishness. Me, in my Chickenhead solution disguise; I've learned that I must act like an asshole in order to get anywhere with this girl. Looking down at her with a half cocked head and a slick, asshole line. She snaps. I snap. That is the game we play amidst this outer layer of getting to know one another. True conversation is like an onion as we must peal past the crust before anything worth consuming can be found. And I'm cool with this. It's natural. While the getting-to-know-you is going on, we each silently look for subtle clues as to each other's real you. This is natural and so it is healthy. In this sense, guys have a little bit of chickenheadishness in us too. It is a fearless facade that allows us to approach and be approached. It is a comfort blanket that keeps us until we can go on without it.
Chickenheadish (adjective) - a figurative layer of the female persona that manifests itself as vanity that is worn to conceal the insecurities associated with an inherent 'good person' that lies hidden within.
So, here's the deal for all of the could-be-Chickenheaded-Women. You've gotta stop all of your pouting, Beamer-crazed, vanity-shrilled-extra-high-pitched-fake-"hello's". Quit acting like you were the product of a three-way between Joy from My Name is Earl, that chick from Clueless, and New York from "I Love New York". Quit emulating Britney Montana. That shit's not cute. Brittany Montana is a dumb slut. Sure, I wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating crackers. But she is empty and uninterested. Underneath it all, she is plain-jane-ugly with no more to talk about than her own miserable life. She is a collectible barbie in a box that is wrapped in plastic and on a shelf.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Butt-Ass-Naked

In my experience, while it is somewhat disconcerting at first, it is quite liberating.
I guess it has been a necessary skill for me to acquire in my 26 years as a red-headed, freckle-faced, allergic-to-air ginger with mild astigmatism. At a certain point, a Man must shrug his shoulders, laugh at himself a little bit, confidently slap the court hard with both hands, look those whom you fear dead in the eyes, and do whatever it is that you do.